SPFPA Disney Local under DOL Investigation
- Eyes on SPFPA
- Mar 25
- 4 min read
Updated: 5 days ago
Three officers of a Walt Disney Land local police security union allegedly received payoffs to affiliate with a national union, according to sources, and the U.S. Department of Labor is now investigating.
IESA Local 1955, which represents about 1,500 security personnel in California’s Disneyland, became affiliated with the Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America (SPFPA) in October 2021.
In order to convince the leadership of Local 1955 to become affiliated with SPFPA, SPFPA allegedly paid members of IESA the Executive Board — Patrick M. Lemos, the Secretary Treasurer of the Union, and Roger Bediamol, the union’s Vice President — $10,000 each, to gain their support.
Those payments were not part of the Affiliation Agreement, and those board members who were not paid were unaware of these payments.
The U.S. Department of Labor is now looking into these payments.
Ryan Hoover, the president of IESA / SPFPA Local 1955, was given $15,000, and was appointed as SPFPA’s West Coast director, with a salary of $100,000 a year.
Those payments were confirmed by Hoover.
In addition to the payoffs, SPFPA is currently under investigation by the Department of Labor for $160,000 which went missing from the SPFPA local’s accounts.
The missing money was discovered during an independent audit of the IESA bank accounts, when the bank accounts of IESA and SPFPA were merged.
SPFPA boasted about the contract it had negotiated for Local 1955 members, but failed to note that these union members were paid $18.10 to $18.13 per hour - which was the lowest pay for security officers in California.
The new contract will increase the hourly pay to $24.00, which is the lowest pay for Disneyland employees.
Soon after this discovery of this missing money earlier this year, Hoover was suspended as the Pacific Coast Director of the SPFPA International, pending the outcome of the investigation by the Department of Labor.
Roger Bediamol, who became the president of IESA Local 1955 after Hoover took the SPFPA job, was also suspended, pending a hearing.
Hoover had admitted to Tom Nunley, an attorney for LEOS-PBA, that some union funds were deposited in his personal account, which was at the same bank as the Union funds.
Hoover also admitted that he held some $28,500 in “union funds” in cash in a bag in his house. Hoover also said he had several cashier checks, which he used to “pay bills during Covid.”
Hoover told Nunley that if a cashier’s check was for $10,000 dollars, he would cash the check and make out a new cashier’s check.
For example, if he had to pay a bill for $8,000 dollars, he would cash the $10,000 dollar check, write a new cashier’s check for $8,000, and place the $2,000 difference a bag of money at his house.
ALEXANDRIA, Va. – A Florida couple pled guilty today to conspiracy to provide and receive prohibited labor payments, in violation of the Labor Management Relations Act, also known as the Taft-Hartley Act.
According to court documents, since at least 2010 until November 2023, Ricky Dallas O’Quinn, 63, of Melbourne, Florida, served as both an officer and employee of International Union, Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America (SPFPA), a labor organization that represents protective security officers at federal workplaces. SPFPA executed collective bargaining agreements with several employers covering the security industry in several states. Ricky’s wife, Mabel O’Quinn, was the founder, incorporator, and an initial director of Company-2, which provided protective security officers at federal workplaces in numerous states. While Mabel served as Company-2’s chief executive officer and president, Ricky was involved in the finance, budget, and operations of the company since its inception in a clandestine role. Both Ricky and Mabel O’Quinn hid Ricky’s involvement in operating Company-2.
Read more about this story: Former SPFPA VP @ Large Rick O'Quinn & His Wife Plead Guilty in a Scheme to Provide & Receive Prohibited Labor Payments
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976: allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
"The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own and do not represent those of my employer, any organization I am affiliated with, or any other individual."
"The contents of this site reflect the personal views of the author and are not intended to reflect the positions or beliefs of any labor organization, nor an endorsement by any labor organization should be inferred."
© 2026 by The Washington DC / NYC PSO's Eyes on SPFPA Watchdog Committee. An Independent Organization seeking Justice & Accountability.
Comments